Arrest of Boston Sober Home Operator Raises Questions About Addiction Treatment
Attorney David Perry's addiction has been marked in various courtrooms for more than a decade. Although he became a symbol of addiction recovery success, charges for which he'll appear in court Monday shatter that. Among other things, the 34-count indictment from the state attorney general accuses Perry — the owner of the sober house Recovery Education Services (RES) in Boston's Roxbury neighborhood — of offering drugs and legal representation to residents of his house in exchange for sex. Several people in Boston's recovery community say they aren't surprised by the charges. They say Perry's case points to the need for stronger regulations on sober homes, especially those that do not take the step of becoming voluntarily certified, which is the only oversight mechanism in Massachusetts. They also say the state needs to ensure that addiction treatment centers are not sending patients to uncertified sober homes for aftercare.Some Clients 'Afraid To Complain' About ConditionsTimothy Ostman, 34, says he lived at Perry's sober house in 2016. He — and some other RES clients who didn't want to be named in this story — agree with much of what is outlined in the indictment. "When you actually first moved in, some people would say, 'Oh, you don't have to pay rent, don't worry about it. You'll just go to the "big bed," ' which meant you'd end up sleeping with Dave Perry if you couldn't pay the rent," Ostman said. "Or if you had legal issues people would say, 'Dave will take care of you if you take care of him.' ""If you had legal issues people would say, 'Dave will take care of you if you take care of him.' Ostman says many people are afraid to complain about sober housing conditions because they're often required to live in sober housing as conditions of probation or to get custody of their children. The AG's indictment also accuses Perry of providing false letters to probation officials on behalf of people associated with RES, in exchange for sex, drugs and money. Perry's lawyer, Peter Pasciucco, says his client denies all the charges and he says Perry has helped, not harmed, scores of people with substance use disorders. At his arraignment this month, Perry was released on $10,000 bail, ordered to wear a GPS monitoring device, and was ordered to stay away from the sober house and those people on a list of those who testified before a grand jury.
Perry has been open about his battles with drugs and alcohol. He's been a frequent speaker at AA meetings and conferences for more than a decade. He says his fight started as a teenager and although he was able to secure a well-paying legal career and all the material signs of success, he couldn't stop drinking and using drugs until 2001, when he was arrested in a federal narcotics sweep." If you were standing next to me in court that day," Perry said at one meeting recorded online, "shackles on my hands, feet and waist. My father sitting in the back wondering what he had done wrong. ... You would think it was the worst day in my life. I've come here to tell you that it was not." Perry calls that arrest "a direct hit" that got his attention and forced him to change. He spent five years on federal probation, which he says helped turn his life into one of helping others with substance use disorders. "If you're one of those people suffering in sobriety, if you're looking around wondering whether this hot coffee-, cold metal chairs-, church basement-, shoot-me-now-feeling is going to end. If that's you, please, please, please my prayer is simple: Come up to any one of us who are carrying this message, we'll show you how to do this. Just tell us your name. We'll take it from there," Perry told an audience.
Perry's story of redemption convinced the Massachusetts Bar of Board Overseers to readmit him to practice law in 2014. In a transcript of the hearing to readmit Perry, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Wolf told Perry: "You have substantially contributed to the improvement and happiness of others. I hope and trust that you will sustain your efforts." But Wolf added, "The challenges never disappear and the journey is never over."
The belief in Perry's redemption also allowed him to secure a contract with at least one licensed addiction treatment provider so patients would continue their aftercare treatment while they lived in his sober home. Several former residents tell WBUR they were referred to RES by their substance use treatment center, Bournewood in Brookline. They say after they completed detox there, they could continue in Bournewood's day program and Bournewood would pay their rent at RES. Bournewood CEO Marcia Fowler says she works with various area sober homes but stopped working with RES at the beginning of this year. "Our main criteria for our relationships with the sober homes is ensuring that there is a clean and sober environment," Fowler said. "We had concerns the patients that we were referring there that the environment was not supportive of their recovery." She says Bournewood does its best to vet sober homes, with staff personally visiting the homes and meeting with the manager and owner. Fowler says housing is often a problem for her patients because many times people have nowhere to live to be able to continue the next step of treatment. There are not enough houses, especially for women. "We're not going to discharge people to the street," Fowler said. "So we would rather discharge someone to a sober home where they could continue to engage in treatment than to have them receive no ongoing treatment at all."
A 2014 Massachusetts law set up a process where sober homes could become certified, but it's voluntary. In 2015, the law required that any vendor with a state contract refer people only to a certified sober home. State Sen. John Keenan, vice chair of the Legislature's Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery, says lawmakers will likely review whether licensed treatment programs are complying with the law. "I'm curious as to how we will be able to determine whether programs that are receiving state funding are referring clients to non-certified sober homes," Keenan said. "I don't know if there is a mechanism in place right now to determine if that's happening. That's something we're going to have to look at." He says it's difficult to regulate sober homes because of federal housing laws that prohibit discrimination against those with disabilities, a group that includes people with addiction. But Keenan says that especially after these allegations the state will work to improve oversight. "Now we have no control over whether somebody wants to run a substandard sober house and we are aware that some of them are still out there," he said. "This one is certainly alarming, but we are trying to beef up our certification process to reward those who are doing the right thing."
The Massachusetts Alliance for Sober Housing, or MASH, has certified about 160 homes throughout the state that provide more than 2,000 beds. Average weekly rents range between $160 and $185.MASH Executive Director Marie Graves says certification means a sober house meets a set of standards and passes third-party safety inspections." Right now the certification is pretty strong and we're really confident with how we're operating our certified homes," Graves said. "What our sober homes do is provide a safe, sober environment of support and recovery. We don't provide treatment; we let the professionals do that. We have standards and operate with integrity. There are some great sober houses that are not certified, but at least with us, you can feel good that there is an entity to uphold the standards."Graves says MASH also reviews complaints against certified sober homes and works with the homes to resolve any issues.
A recent General Accountability Office report looked at sober housing in five states, including Massachusetts. It mentions the complaint process as being significant, but it also says there were no recent revocations of any sober home certifications in Massachusetts. The report also cites the settlements the state reached between 2007 and 2015 with laboratories accused of paying kickbacks to recovery homes for patient referrals for urine drug testing that was not medically necessary.